Blog post #6 - DSLR strengths and weaknesses

There are number of key things about DSLR cameras that are a considerable advantage to anyone who wants to pick one up and film. However, like with most things, there are negatives that you must consider when choosing to use these pieces of equipment. Here are some of the biggest pros that I have come to find out about the cameras:

• One of the biggest things they have going for them is the price range; it can certainly still be costly to purchase one of the higher tier DSLR cameras, but pricing isn't completely prohibitive. You can pick up new and used Canons from $800-$2000. The most important aspect of this is that it allows easier access to individuals wanting to film. They no longer need to spend thousands or tens of thousands on a camera just to be able to film. This is opening up the market for a whole new generation of creative minds.
• DSLRs, unlike many digital cameras within the same(ish) price range, allow interchangeable lenses. This is an incredibly useful feature. The bodies of these cameras are not mind blowing, but that becomes a tad less important when you have the ability to put on some of the best glass available.
• The cameras are light weight, simple in build, and user friendly. These are great if you don't want, or can't worry about the hassle of carrying a large camera and the tons of equipment you mind need to go with it. It makes shooting fast and easy.
• To go along with the two points mentioned above, the can be outfitted with just about endless features; these cameras can be transformed from simple point and shooters, to an impressive rig if you want to invest in the build of it.
• For the price range, these cameras carry great sensors, which in turn make them great for shooting in low light situations; this goes hand in hand with low budget productions where light will most likely be limited.

Now with all these positives aspects of the cameras come the drawbacks that you need to be aware of when working with them.

• These cameras should be on sticks or in a type of steady rig. They are not for straight hand-held unless you have the steadiness of a surgeon. One of the things people love about the cameras is their ability to crush the depth of field, providing a cinematic look to the digital imagery. These can also be one of the biggest negatives with the equipment as well. The incredibly shallow depth of field can cause of types of issues with the focus, especially if you are not completely static while operating. 
• They are small and have these powerful sensors inside them. Even the models with the sturdier bodies, will heat up quickly on the inside. These cameras don't hold up well to heat. Running the for long, long stretches of time are not advised.
• The customization of DSLRs is great, with that said, the cameras as is aren't great for filming. You need to invest in them if you want to get the most out of them.
• I prefer running dual sound anyway, but if you are shooting with these cameras, it's basically as must. Otherwise, if you use the mic built into the camera, your audio will suffer.  

 I like the idea behind DSLR cinematography and film making. It's opening up new opportunities and creation that either didn't exist or was incredibly limited before. Having said that, I personally am not a fan of DSLR cameras. I have seen amazing footage and stories told through these cameras, but I can always tell when a DSLR has been used, and I typically just don't like the images it produces and while working with them, I dislike the problems that come up. Also, as much as I like how it is opening up the industry for young film makers; I dislike the type of over saturation coming as a result as well. By that I mean, just because these cameras have their unique capabilities, does not mean that it should become the definitive go to camera. I see countless pieces about producers and directors who obsess over the cameras because of the type of hype that has developed around them. That's what they go with, which I can understand for budgetary reasons, but then there are the times where the camera clearly was not the best choice, and the project ends up looking like shit. I just don't like to see it being used as a type of crutch for film makers. That's a personal complaint though, and stems more from the way some projects are produced rather than the actual cameras.